Independents demand to be heard at polls
Election 2006: The fastest-growing segment of Oregon voters pushes for more clout -- and candidates -- here and across the nation.

Sunday, February 19, 2006
HARRY ESTEVE

Alan Walker studies the names when he gets ready to mark a ballot, but barely glances at the letters beside them.

"I generally prefer to vote for the person, not the party," says Walker, an engineer at Hynix Semiconducter in Eugene. Republican? Democrat? He doesn't really care too much -- as long as the candidate has something to offer.

"I just don't like all the partisanship," he says.

Walker, 37, is part of an increasingly influential corps of independent, or non-affiliated, voters in Oregon. It's a movement that, with no organization, no advertising, no focus groups, has become the fastest-growing segment of the state's electorate.

The impact is clear in Oregon, where a Republican state senator has bolted the party to run for governor as an independent, another senator says she might drop her Democratic ties when she returns to Salem next year, and a campaign has been launched to put an independent-friendly open primary measure on the November ballot.

Across the nation, meanwhile, independent candidates are making credible runs for governor in several states.

It adds up to what could be a banner year for those who have decided to dispense with party labels.

State Sen. Ben Westlund, a Bend businessman and political centrist, last week quit a lifelong membership in the Republican Party and announced he is running for governor as an independent. He has begun collecting the 18,368 signatures he needs to get his name on the November general election ballot.

Westlund says he plans to present himself as the calmer alternative to "the name-calling, the demagoguery" that often tars two-party campaigns. "People are weary of being told who's right -- the R's are right, the D's are right -- as opposed to having an intelligent discussion of what's right for Oregon," he says.

His main message -- that "extreme partisanship" has strangled Oregon's ability to move forward on its biggest problems -- couldn't be timed better, says Phil Keisling, former Democratic secretary of state and advocate for reducing the power of political parties.

"Voters for years have been telling us they don't like what either of the two major parties are selling," Keisling says. In the past, he says, the parties had a defined middle that forged the policies that gave Oregon its reputation as a progressive and innovative state.

"Now," he says, "it's just partisan games of gotcha, vicious attacks, talk radio. It's just sad."

Primaries for everyone

Keisling is a force behind the effort to put an open-primary measure on the November ballot that would give independent voters the same ability to nominate candidates as registered Republicans and Democrats.

Under the measure, all voters, regardless of party affiliation, would receive a primary ballot and vote on a roster of candidates. The top two would then run in the general election.

Keisling predicts independent voters, along with those who don't feel comfortable with the parties they've chosen, will be a potent voice in the upcoming election.

"There's a tectonic plate that is moving underneath the landscape of Oregon politics," Keisling says. "We are going to have a wonderful debate in November."

Not everyone is so sure. Oregon Senate Minority Leader Ted Ferrioli, R-John Day, says the state has been fiercely partisan since its inception, and the clash between parties often has beneficial political results.

"There's always been high drama, always been polarity in politics," Ferrioli says. Parties provide the organization, financial support and political umbrella that can make or break a campaign.

For independents, "it's awfully lonely out there," Ferrioli says. He, like several others, say that because Westlund can claim a moderate political background, his candidacy will serve as a real test of the lure of independence in politics.

"This is either the catalyst independents in Oregon are looking for, or maybe the deflation of the balloon," Ferrioli says. "He's viable. If he can't make it as an independent, who can?"

Dropping in, dropping out

Reasons for going the independent route abound. Many become fed up with the often unseemly and shrill power struggle between the two major parties, and they drop their registration in protest. Others say they like aspects of both parties and are reluctant to commit to one or the other.

State Sen. Avel Gordly of Portland says she is leaning toward dropping her Democratic Party ties, reclaiming the independent status she gave up to vote for Jesse Jackson in the 1984 presidential primary.

Never comfortable with party politics, Gordly says the most recent legislative session -- known for its hardball partisan wrangling -- pushed her to her limit.

"Everything was couched in terms of taking back the House, taking the Senate, posturing for the next election cycle," she says. It didn't leave much room for talking about Oregon's future, or making good policy.

She says she became so repulsed at one point last year that she switched her registration to independent status. She later re-registered as a Democrat so she wouldn't lose her voice in the Senate caucus meetings.

Now that the Senate Democrats have closed their caucus meetings to the press, Gordly says she won't attend, which gives her one more reason to go independent again.

By doing so, Gordly and others give up a fair amount of voting clout, unable to participate in nominating either Democratic or Republican candidates for president, the Legislature, governor or other partisan offices. That limitation has been bugging Lawrence Gallop, a 47-year-old retired postal worker living in Portland.

"I'm thinking seriously about signing up as a Democrat," says Gallop, who hasn't registered with a party in more than 10 years. Frustration with the Bush administration and a desire to vote in the next primary might push him back in the partisan fold, he says.

But he would be bucking the trend. In Oregon, as well as nationally, the two major parties have lost ground to independents and, to a lesser degree, minor parties, such as the Libertarians and the Greens. Combined, independents and minor party voters now make up about one-fourth of the approximately 2 million registered voters in the state.

In past elections, independents were seen as swing voters who could decide a close race between Democratic and Republican candidates. Increasingly, however, they're being given a third choice: a candidate who, like them, has opted to forgo party labels and go on the ballot unattached.

In Texas, for example, two independent candidates are running for governor, one of whom has raised close to $2 million so far. Independents are running for governor in several other states as well, including Alaska, Georgia and Minnesota.

"I would say that nationally, there has been a slight spike in credible independents running for governor," says Austin Cassidy, who runs Third Party Watch (http://thirdpartywatch.com), a Web site based in Jacksonville, Fla., that tracks unaffiliated and minor party candidates.

That's a healthy change, says Walker, the Eugene engineer. "I would like a broader spectrum," he says. "It's nice to sometimes have more than two candidates."